By Bob Williams
WASHINGTON, May 29, 2003 The nation's top broadcasters have met behind closed doors with Federal Communications Commission officials more than
70 times to discuss a sweeping set of proposals to relax media ownership rules,
the Center for Public Integrity has discovered.
The private sessions included dozens of meetings between broadcasters and the
agency's five commissioners and their top advisors. A June 2 vote is scheduled
on the controversial proposals, which critics fear will touch off a major new
round of media consolidation. See a list of
the media ownership proposals.
The 71 meetings FCC officials have held with top broadcasters were in stark
contrast to the number of private sessions with Consumers Union and the Media
Access Project, the two major consumer groups working on the issue. Those two
groups have had only five such sessions with commissioners and other agency
officials since the proposals first surfaced eight months ago.
Rather than send their lobbyists to the closed door meetings, many of the
broadcasting behemoths who stand to benefit the most from the pending relaxation
of the ownership rules have sent their top executives to lobby the agency
personally.
Media moguls Rupert Murdoch of News Corp., which owns Fox, and Mel Karmazin
of Viacom, which owns CBS, virtually dashed from one FCC office to another for a
series of private meetings with commissioners and top staff in late January and
early February, as the agency was crafting the controversial proposals.
| RELATED REPORT |
| Check the Center for Public Integrity's telecom
project and access the full database at
www.openairwaves.org.
|
All told, the five FCC commissioners and 31 other top officials participated
in such meetings since the rules were first proposed in September 2002. A total
of 63 executives and representatives of the nation's top ten television and
radio broadcasters participated in the meetings.
One particularly busy day was March 11, when 18 FCC officials met with
executives and representatives of ABC and its parent company, Disney, in six
different sessions.
Some of the sessions included several commissioners and top staff, all
gathered in one room to discuss the proposed rule changes with broadcasters. At
some of the sessions executives from the nation's top broadcasters, such as News
Corp./Fox, General Electric/NBC, Viacom/CBS and Disney/ABC, teamed together to
lobby for the proposed changes.
The closed-door sessions, which are officially called ex parte meetings, are
allowed under FCC rules. The meetings are not recorded, nor are the participants
required to keep detailed minutes of the sessions. Non-FCC people who
participate in the meetings are supposed to file a notice of the session by the
end of the following day. The notice is supposed to include a summary of what
was discussed.
FCC spokesman David Fiske says the agency believes its rulemaking procedures
are completely open and transparent.
"There is a very detailed public record of everything in the process,
including the ex parte meetings," said Fiske. "We want a wide variety of
comments from everyoneincluding those from businesses. "This is what good
regulatory agencies do."
Some critics charge that the ex parte process simply allows broadcasters and
other industries the FCC regulates to conduct their meetings out of the public
eye.
"Traditionally, these things have been done by the FCC without any sort of
meaningful public involvement," said Robert McChesney, author of "Rich Media,
Poor Democracy" and research professor in the Institute of Communications
Research at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "This is just par
for the course with the FCC. They are much more interested in protecting
business than looking out for the public."
Another critic of the FCC rulemaking procedure in general and the ex parte
process in particular is Danny Schechter, executive director of Mediachannel.org,
a media watchdog group.
"There is a complete lack of transparency in the rulemaking process at the
FCC," said Schechter. "These issues get treated as just business issues, when
they are vital to our democracy. When real money is involved, the work gets done
in the dark of night."
Although the FCC has held only one official public hearing on the rule changes,
Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein pointed out that he and Commissioner Michael Copps
had held more than a dozen informal hearings all across the country on the issue
in recent weeks.
"In addition to meeting with some broadcasters, Commissioner Copps and I
traveled across the country and held a series of unprecedented hearings in which
we've heard from hundreds and hundreds of citizens," said Adelstein. "Not one of
these citizens stood up to say they want to see big media get even bigger. We're
doing everything we can to protect those people we heard from and their interests
ahead of the interests of corporations that seek to profit by using the public
airwaves."
Copps says average citizens at the hearings have not had any trouble
understanding the issue.
"The principles at stake are fundamental and go to the heart of our democracy,"
he said in a prepared statement. "In my book, every American is a stakeholder when
the future of the media hangs in the balance."
FCC Commissioner Kevin Martin attended the most private sessions with
broadcasters, 16 in all. Martin, a Republican, is considered to be the key swing
vote on the commission. He met with the country's largest television
broadcaster, Viacom, three times. He also met with NBC (three times), ABC (two
times), Hearst (two times), News Corp., Gannett, Clear Channel Communications,
Cox Enterprises, Cumulus Broadcasting, and Radio One (one time).
In a prepared statement, Martin said he has an open door policy. An aide to
Martin said he did not know how many times the commissioner had participated in
ex parte meetings with private citizens about the proposed media ownership
rules.
"I will meet with any individual or group that requests a meeting, to the
extent my schedule can accommodate the request," said the statement.
FCC Chairman Michael Powell, a Republican who has pushed hard to relax the
media ownership rules and put the proposals on the June 2 agenda, participated
in four such meetings.
On January 30, Powell and legal advisor Susan Eid met with News Corp.'s
Murdoch and two other company officials.
On February 20, Powell and legal advisor Susan Eid met with Viacom's Karmazin
and two other company executives.
On April 1, Powell, Eid and his chief of staff Marsha MacBride met with NBC
President Robert Wright and other network brass. Commissioner Kevin Martin and
Media Bureau Chief Kenneth Ferree, the chief architect of the proposed rule
changes, also attended that session.
On May 1, Powell and MacBride met with Gannett President and CEO Doug
McCorkindale and three other executives from the company.
Appearing on CNBC Wednesday evening, Chairman Powell said he believes the FCC
is the second most heavily lobbied institution in the federal government,
trailing only Congress.
"I do think thatthat sometimes it gets out of hand," said Powell. "I often
think that we need time to do our work rather than hear pitches."
He said the agency is like a mini-legislature.
"If we're just Congress lite, then I question what value we're really
bringing," said Powell. "If it's all about bringing public pressure to the
agency and they'll do whatever the will of that pressure is, I question what
we're adding to the United States government."
Commissioner Adelstein, a Democrat, participated in eight meetings.
Among the broadcasters he met with were Viacom, News Corp., ABC, Gannett,
Hearst, Cumulus, Radio One and the National Association of Broadcasters.
Commissioner Copps, a Democrat, was at seven meetings. Among those he
met with were Viacom, News Corp., NBC, Gannett, Cumulus and Radio One.
Commissioner Abernathy, a Republican, was at seven meetings. Among those she met
with were Viacom, NBC, ABC, Gannett and the National Association of
Broadcasters.
Some top advisors to the commissioners and the chairman met with broadcasters
many times. At the top of the list was Catherine Bohigian, a legal advisor to
Commissioner Martin, who met with broadcasters 19 times. Others included
Powell's legal advisor Susan Eid (17); and Stacy Robinson, legal advisor to
Commissioner Abernathy (15).
Ferree, the Media Bureau Chief and chief architect of the proposals, met with
broadcasters 11 times.